国内法院对奥运会组委会的管辖权边界──以15名女子跳台滑雪运动员诉温哥华冬奥会组委会为例

Domestic Courts' Jurisdiction Boundary concerning the Organizing Committee of Olympic Games: Taking the Case of the 15 Women Ski Jumpers v. Vancouver Olympics Organizing Committee as an Example

投稿时间：2018-04-21

DOI：

中文关键词:国内法院奥组委司法管辖国际体育仲裁院

英文关键词:domestic court Olympic Organizing Committee jurisdiction Court of Arbitration for Sport

基金项目:

作者	单位	E-mail
王进	湘潭大学法学院	858483896@qq.com

摘要点击次数: 2612

全文下载次数: 2829

中文摘要:

在15名女子跳台滑雪运动员诉温哥华冬奥会组委会一案中，加拿大国内法院对于奥运会组委会的管辖权问题成为了争议的焦点。奥组委在形式上虽然是一个国内组织，但由于其与国际奥委会、各国际单项体育联合会以及国内政府之间的特殊关系，使得国内法院在决定是否对涉及奥组委的争议案件行使管辖权时，不得不谨慎地判断争议行为作出的真正主体。通常情况下，对于奥组委执行国际体育组织的奥林匹克决议产生的纠纷，国内法院应当遵守《奥林匹克宪章》的规定，放弃对此类争议的管辖权，交由具有合法资格的国际体育仲裁院（CAS）进行裁决。

英文摘要:

In the case of the 15 women ski jumpers v. Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee, the jurisdiction of the domestic court over the Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games became the focus of controversy. Though the Organizing Committee of the Olympics is a domestic organization, yet the special relationships between IOC, the different international sports federations and the domestic governments make the domestic court to judge carefully which one is the real main body of the dispute when the court tries to decide whether to exercise jurisdiction over the case concerning the Organizing Committee of the Olympics. In general, for disputes arising from the Organizing Committee's implementation of the Olympic decision of the international sports organizations, domestic court should abide by the Olympic Charter, waive jurisdiction for such disputes and pass the cases to CAS for adjudication.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭