纠纷的“可体育仲裁性”——以CAS仲裁规则为视角

"Sport Arbitrability" of Disputes: Based on the Analysis of CAS Arbitration Rules

投稿时间：2019-02-10

DOI：

英文关键词:sport arbitrability sport dispute arbitration CAS

基金项目:国家社科基金项目（17BTY007）

作者	单位	E-mail
赵永如	苏州大学王健法学院	yaron.z@foxmail.com

摘要点击次数: 2147

全文下载次数: 2344

中文摘要:

纠纷的“可体育仲裁性”是指相关纠纷是否可以交由体育仲裁机构管辖。因欠缺可操作性，CAS的相关规定在实践中并未获得重视。我国“阿尔滨案”和比利时“Seraing案”等案件在一定程度上揭示了忽视纠纷“可体育仲裁性”的现实争议和潜在问题。考虑到体育争端解决机构的定位，为更好地保护弱势当事方的利益，促进世界范围内体育仲裁体系的发展完善，实践中应以纠纷的可仲裁性为基础，将纠纷的体育专业性、体育规则适用的一致性、体育自治利益的相关性作为纠纷“可体育仲裁性”的认定要素，以完善CAS的相关规定，从而促进“可体育仲裁性”规则的适用。我国同样需要借鉴CAS经验，在立法上进一步明确纠纷的“可体育仲裁性”规则。

英文摘要:

The sport arbitrability of disputes refers to whether some disputes can be placed under the jurisdiction of a sport arbitration institution. Due to the impracticability in execution，the relevant rules of Court of Arbitration for Sport have not drawn adequate attention in practice. Cases like the "Aerbin case" in China and the "Seraing case" in Belgium reveal to some extent the hiding problems of neglecting the sport arbitrability of disputes. Considering the function of the sports dispute resolution body, and the aim to better protect the interests of the disadvantaged party and to promote the development and perfection of the sports arbitration system worldwide at the same time, the rule-makers should have dispute arbitrability as the precondition and combine sport nature of disputes, consistency of the sport rule application, and interests of sport autonomy as the basic elements to identify sport arbitrability of disputes so as to modify the relevant provisions of CAS and promote the application of the sport arbitrability rules. China also should learn from CAS experience and further clarify the rules for sport arbitrability of disputes in its legislation.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭